We provide end-to-end human-centric services to train, fine-tune, evaluate and monitor generative AI.
Our process-driven services bridge this gap by:
Instruction dataset creation (pair prompts & ideal responses for instruction-tuning / SFT)
Human-in-the-Loop workflows for model improvement, online learning, and human review of model outputs
Evaluation & red-teaming: scoring, edge-case identification, adversarial tests, hallucination checks
Prompt engineering & dataset augmentation: curated pseudo-labels, synthetic data verification
Continuous quality pipelines and audit trails for compliance

From instruction tuning datasets to live model evaluation — every step backed by trained human judgment.
We design and annotate instruction-response pairs tailored to your model objective:
Measure and harden model behavior:
High-accuracy annotation across modalities:
Embed humans where models fail or where high-stakes decisions matter:
Generate controlled synthetic examples and validate them:
The quality of your model is a direct function of the quality of its training signal. Here's how we protect that signal at every step.
Preference ranking, response scoring, and instruction following evaluation require a different skill set from standard labeling. We screen, train, and calibrate annotators specifically for generative AI tasks before any project begins.
Subjective GenAI judgments — helpfulness, factuality, tone — are only as reliable as the consistency between reviewers. We track inter-annotator agreement on every batch and flag drift before it contaminates your training signal.
Effective adversarial testing requires reviewers who understand your model's domain and failure modes. Our red teamers are matched to your use case — whether that's a customer facing chatbot, a code generation tool, or a medical information system.
We don't just generate synthetic examples — we validate them. Every synthetic prompt, paraphrase, or augmented sample is reviewed by human annotators to confirm it meets your quality bar before entering the training pipeline.
Human corrections, preference signals, and evaluation outputs are structured and delivered in formats your pipeline can ingest directly. Fresh human signal, on your retraining cadence, without manual reformatting overhead.
Model training data and evaluation logs often contain sensitive content. All workflows run under strict access controls, encrypted transfer, and data handling agreements designed for regulated and high sensitivity AI development.
What makes us different from others? We give holistic solutions
with strategy, design & technology.
Talk to us about building ML-ready processes that turn relevance into results.